cb 1 (Chembridge)
Structured Review
![A. Schematic showing the potential effect of ThsB inhibition on 3′-cADPR signaling. B. Extracted ion chromatograms (EICs) of 3′-cADPR [M–H] − (m/z 540.0424–540.0640) in the lysate of B. subtilis expressing ThsB 0 to 70 minutes after infection with phage SPO1 (MOI = 10). C. The MS/MS spectrum of 3′-cADPR at m/z 404.9987 shows expected fragments. Data were collected in negative ionization mode. D. Biological triplicate measurement of the normalized level of 3′-cADPR in cell lysate 50 min after infection with SPO1. 100 μM of each inhibitor was tested, and their data were normalized to DMSO-treated samples (dashed line). An uninfected “no induction” sample was used as a negative control for signal production. Data are represented as the average ± SEM from three independent biological replicates. Each replicate is displayed with a circle. One-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test (single pooled variance) showed no significant difference between any inhibitor and the ‘no inhibitor’ control (adjusted P values: NCI-2, 0.93; <t>CB-1,</t> 0.83; CB-6, 0.43).](https://bio-rxiv-images-cdn.bioz.com/dois_ending_with_36/10__64898_slash_2026__04__28__721336/10__64898_slash_2026__04__28__721336___F3.large.jpg)
Cb 1, supplied by Chembridge, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/cb+1/bio_rxiv__64898__2026__04__28__721336-47-19-10?v=Chembridge
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "Chemical suppression of a bacterial immune system revives repressed phages"
Article Title: Chemical suppression of a bacterial immune system revives repressed phages
Journal: bioRxiv
doi: 10.64898/2026.04.28.721336
Figure Legend Snippet: A. Schematic showing the potential effect of ThsB inhibition on 3′-cADPR signaling. B. Extracted ion chromatograms (EICs) of 3′-cADPR [M–H] − (m/z 540.0424–540.0640) in the lysate of B. subtilis expressing ThsB 0 to 70 minutes after infection with phage SPO1 (MOI = 10). C. The MS/MS spectrum of 3′-cADPR at m/z 404.9987 shows expected fragments. Data were collected in negative ionization mode. D. Biological triplicate measurement of the normalized level of 3′-cADPR in cell lysate 50 min after infection with SPO1. 100 μM of each inhibitor was tested, and their data were normalized to DMSO-treated samples (dashed line). An uninfected “no induction” sample was used as a negative control for signal production. Data are represented as the average ± SEM from three independent biological replicates. Each replicate is displayed with a circle. One-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test (single pooled variance) showed no significant difference between any inhibitor and the ‘no inhibitor’ control (adjusted P values: NCI-2, 0.93; CB-1, 0.83; CB-6, 0.43).
Techniques Used: Inhibition, Expressing, Infection, Tandem Mass Spectroscopy, Negative Control, Control
Figure Legend Snippet: Comparison of the 3′-cADPR binding to the ThsA SLOG domain (PED ID 7UXS chain A ), left panel, to the Boltz-2 modeling largest cluster (middle panel) and Boltz-2 selected model from the largest cluster (cyan) with the best MolModa docking model (orange) (right panel). A. Prediction results for the CB-1 inhibitor, the largest cluster of 57 of 100 Boltz-2 models are shown (middle panel). B. Prediction of NCI-2 binding. The largest cluster of 84 of 100 models predicted by Boltz-2 is shown in the middle panel.
Techniques Used: Comparison, Binding Assay
Figure Legend Snippet: A: Schematic showing the hypothetical requirement for consistent antiphage immunity to actively repress low levels of phages. Immune suppression would revive ‘persister’ phages. B: Lysis curves of type I Thoeris-expressing B. subtilis infected with SPO1 phage (MOI = 0.01), followed by addition of inhibitor CB-1 (100 µM) after different time delays. See also . C. Schematic showing the hypothetical population lysis resulting from inhibiting the immune system of only some bacteria in a cooperating community. D. Lysis curves of a 1:1 mixture of type I Thoeris-expressing B. subtilis and type II Thoeris-expressing B. subtilis infected with SPO1 phage (MOI = 0.01) and treated with either CB-1 (type I Thoeris inhibitor, 100 µM), IP6C (type II Thoeris inhibitor, 300 µM), or neither (DMSO). E. Lysis curves of a 1:9 and 9:1 mixtures of type I Thoeris-expressing B. subtilis and type II Thoeris-expressing B. subtilis infected with SPO1 phage (MOI = 0.01) and treated with either CB-1 (type I Thoeris inhibitor, 100 µM), IP6C (type II Thoeris inhibitor, 300 µM), or neither (DMSO). In panels B, D, and E, shaded error ranges represent SEM of a biological triplicate.
Techniques Used: Lysis, Expressing, Infection, Bacteria
Figure Legend Snippet: A–B. Lysis curves of type I Thoeris-expressing B. subtilis infected with SP50 (A, MOI = 0.01) or Goe2 phage (B, MOI = 0.0001), followed by addition of inhibitor CB-1 (100 µM) after different time delays.
Techniques Used: Lysis, Expressing, Infection
